Search for Indicators
Health
Use the drop-down menu to see data for different locations.
Indicator Gauge Icon Legend
Legend Colors
Red is bad, green is good, blue is not statistically different/neutral.
Compared to Distribution
the value is in the best half of communities.
the value is in the 2nd worst quarter of communities.
the value is in the worst quarter of communities.
Compared to Target
meets target; does not meet target.
Compared to a Single Value
lower than the comparison value; higher than the comparison value; not statistically different from comparison value.
Trend
non-significant change over time; significant change over time; no change over time.
Compared to Prior Value
higher than the previous measurement period; lower than the previous measurement period; no statistically different change from previous measurement period.
County: Cameron
Health / Alcohol & Drug Use
Value
Compared to:
County: Cameron Adults who Binge Drink
County: Cameron Adults who Binge Drink
20.3%
(2017)
Compared to:
TX Value
(17.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
US Value
(17.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System
Prior Value
(12.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Cameron Adults who Drink Excessively
County: Cameron Adults who Drink Excessively
16.8%
(2021)
Compared to:
TX Counties
The distribution is based on data from 254 Texas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
TX Value
(18.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
US Value
(18.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(18.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Cameron Age-Adjusted Drug and Opioid-Involved Overdose Death Rate
County: Cameron Age-Adjusted Drug and Opioid-Involved Overdose Death Rate
5.2
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 1,303 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
TX Value
(11.8)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
US Value
(23.5)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(6.1)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
County: Cameron Death Rate due to Drug Poisoning
County: Cameron Death Rate due to Drug Poisoning
5.7
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2019-2021)
Compared to:
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 1,899 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
TX Value
(14.0)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
US Value
(27.2)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
HP 2030 Target
(20.7)
<div>SU-03: Reduce drug overdose deaths <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong></div>
County: Cameron
Health / Cancer
Value
Compared to:
County: Cameron Adults with Cancer
County: Cameron Adults with Cancer
5.2%
(2021)
Compared to:
TX Counties
The distribution is based on data from 254 Texas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
US Value
(7.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Rio Grande Valley Regional Value
(4.6% in 2020)
The regional value is compared to the Rio Grande Valley Region value.
County: Cameron Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Breast Cancer
County: Cameron Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Breast Cancer
20.1
Deaths per 100,000 females
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 1,755 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
TX Value
(19.7)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
US Value
(19.6)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(20.1)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(15.3)
County: Cameron Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Cancer
County: Cameron Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Cancer
117.3
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
TX Counties
The distribution is based on data from 243 Texas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,085 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
TX Value
(144.5)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
US Value
(149.4)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(120.9)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(122.7)
County: Cameron Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Colorectal Cancer
County: Cameron Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Colorectal Cancer
12.3
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
TX Counties
The distribution is based on data from 147 Texas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,174 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
TX Value
(13.7)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
US Value
(13.1)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(12.4)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(8.9)
County: Cameron Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Lung Cancer
County: Cameron Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Lung Cancer
17.5
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
TX Counties
The distribution is based on data from 188 Texas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,752 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
TX Value
(31.3)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
US Value
(35.0)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(18.8)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(25.1)
County: Cameron Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Prostate Cancer
County: Cameron Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Prostate Cancer
12.4
Deaths per 100,000 males
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 1,576 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
TX Value
(17.6)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
US Value
(18.8)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(13.4)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(16.9)
County: Cameron All Cancer Incidence Rate
County: Cameron All Cancer Incidence Rate
357.0
Cases per 100,000 population
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
TX Counties
The distribution is based on data from 251 Texas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,693 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
TX Value
(412.2)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
US Value
(442.3)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(365.7)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Cameron Breast Cancer Incidence Rate
County: Cameron Breast Cancer Incidence Rate
91.3
Cases per 100,000 females
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
TX Counties
The distribution is based on data from 203 Texas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,478 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
TX Value
(116.3)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
US Value
(127.0)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(95.7)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Cameron Cancer: Medicare Population
County: Cameron Cancer: Medicare Population
10.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
TX Counties
The distribution is based on data from 254 Texas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
TX Value
(11.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
US Value
(12.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Rio Grande Valley Regional Value
(6.5% in 2018)
The regional value is compared to the Rio Grande Valley Region value.
Prior Value
(9.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Cameron Cervical Cancer Incidence Rate
County: Cameron Cervical Cancer Incidence Rate
10.8
Cases per 100,000 females
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 696 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
TX Value
(9.4)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
US Value
(7.5)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(11.3)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Cameron Cervical Cancer Screening: 21-65
County: Cameron Cervical Cancer Screening: 21-65
72.8%
(2020)
Compared to:
TX Counties
The distribution is based on data from 254 Texas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
US Value
(82.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Rio Grande Valley Regional Value
(71.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Rio Grande Valley Region value.
County: Cameron Colon Cancer Screening
County: Cameron Colon Cancer Screening
48.7%
(2018)
Compared to:
TX Counties
The distribution is based on data from 254 Texas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,142 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
US Value
(66.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Rio Grande Valley Regional Value
(49.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Rio Grande Valley Region value.
County: Cameron Colon Cancer Screening: USPSTF Recommendation
County: Cameron Colon Cancer Screening: USPSTF Recommendation
59.7%
(2020)
Compared to:
TX Counties
The distribution is based on data from 254 Texas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
US Value
(72.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Rio Grande Valley Regional Value
(56.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Rio Grande Valley Region value.
County: Cameron Colorectal Cancer Incidence Rate
County: Cameron Colorectal Cancer Incidence Rate
37.9
Cases per 100,000 population
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
TX Counties
The distribution is based on data from 192 Texas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,401 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
TX Value
(37.1)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
US Value
(36.5)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(39.3)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Cameron Lung and Bronchus Cancer Incidence Rate
County: Cameron Lung and Bronchus Cancer Incidence Rate
26.4
Cases per 100,000 population
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
TX Counties
The distribution is based on data from 198 Texas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,471 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
TX Value
(46.5)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
US Value
(54.0)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(29.2)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Cameron Mammogram in Past 2 Years: 50-74
County: Cameron Mammogram in Past 2 Years: 50-74
67.8%
(2020)
Compared to:
TX Counties
The distribution is based on data from 254 Texas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
US Value
(78.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Rio Grande Valley Regional Value
(67.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Rio Grande Valley Region value.
HP 2030 Target
(80.3%)
County: Cameron Mammography Screening: Medicare Population
County: Cameron Mammography Screening: Medicare Population
29.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
TX Counties
The distribution is based on data from 250 Texas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,123 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
TX Value
(42.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
US Value
(47.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(32.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Cameron Oral Cavity and Pharynx Cancer Incidence Rate
County: Cameron Oral Cavity and Pharynx Cancer Incidence Rate
7.9
Cases per 100,000 population
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
TX Counties
(2011-2015)
The distribution is based on data from 181 Texas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 1,706 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
TX Value
(11.2)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
US Value
(11.9)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(8.0)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Cameron Prostate Cancer Incidence Rate
County: Cameron Prostate Cancer Incidence Rate
82.6
Cases per 100,000 males
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
TX Counties
The distribution is based on data from 201 Texas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,500 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
TX Value
(103.4)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
US Value
(110.5)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(85.7)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Cameron
Health / Diabetes
Value
Compared to:
County: Cameron Adults enrolled in Group Lifestyle Balance classes
County: Cameron Adults enrolled in Group Lifestyle Balance classes
49
Number of GLB participants
(2020)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(218)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
59.8%
(2017)
Compared to:
TX Value
(52.9% in 2021)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
Rio Grande Valley Regional Value
(48.1% in 2016)
The regional value is compared to the Rio Grande Valley Region value.
Prior Value
(50.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
County: Cameron Adults with Diabetes
County: Cameron Adults with Diabetes
18.2%
(2017)
Compared to:
TX Value
(11.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
US Value
(10.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System
Prior Value
(14.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Cameron Adults with Prediabetes
County: Cameron Adults with Prediabetes
7.3%
(2017)
Compared to:
TX Value
(11.3% in 2021)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
Rio Grande Valley Regional Value
(11.3% in 2015)
The regional value is compared to the Rio Grande Valley Region value.
Prior Value
(8.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
County: Cameron Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Diabetes
County: Cameron Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Diabetes
35.8
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
TX Counties
The distribution is based on data from 133 Texas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 1,937 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
TX Value
(23.8)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
US Value
(22.6)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Rio Grande Valley Regional Value
(33.3)
The regional value is compared to the Rio Grande Valley Region value.
Prior Value
(30.9)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Cameron Diabetes: Medicare Population
County: Cameron Diabetes: Medicare Population
30.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
TX Counties
The distribution is based on data from 254 Texas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
TX Value
(25.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
US Value
(24.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Rio Grande Valley Regional Value
(43.1% in 2018)
The regional value is compared to the Rio Grande Valley Region value.
Prior Value
(29.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Cameron
Health / Disabilities
Value
Compared to:
County: Cameron Adults with Disability Living in Poverty
County: Cameron Adults with Disability Living in Poverty
29.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
TX Counties
The distribution is based on data from 253 Texas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,132 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
TX Value
(22.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
US Value
(24.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Rio Grande Valley Regional Value
(31.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Rio Grande Valley Region value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Cameron Children with a Disability
County: Cameron Children with a Disability
5.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
TX Value
(4.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
US Value
(4.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Rio Grande Valley Regional Value
(5.5% in 2017-2021)
The regional value is compared to the Rio Grande Valley Region value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Cameron Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty
County: Cameron Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty
5.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
TX Value
(4.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
US Value
(5.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Rio Grande Valley Regional Value
(5.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Rio Grande Valley Region value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Cameron Persons with a Disability
County: Cameron Persons with a Disability
13.1%
(2022)
Compared to:
TX Value
(12.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
Prior Value
(12.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Cameron Persons with a Disability
County: Cameron Persons with a Disability
12.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
TX Value
(11.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
US Value
(12.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Rio Grande Valley Regional Value
(12.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Rio Grande Valley Region value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Cameron Persons with a Hearing Difficulty
County: Cameron Persons with a Hearing Difficulty
3.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
TX Value
(3.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
US Value
(3.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Rio Grande Valley Regional Value
(3.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Rio Grande Valley Region value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Cameron Persons with a Self-Care Difficulty
County: Cameron Persons with a Self-Care Difficulty
4.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
TX Value
(2.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
US Value
(2.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Rio Grande Valley Regional Value
(4.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Rio Grande Valley Region value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Cameron Persons with a Vision Difficulty
County: Cameron Persons with a Vision Difficulty
2.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
TX Value
(2.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
US Value
(2.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Rio Grande Valley Regional Value
(3.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Rio Grande Valley Region value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Cameron Persons with an Ambulatory Difficulty
County: Cameron Persons with an Ambulatory Difficulty
7.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
TX Value
(6.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
US Value
(6.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Rio Grande Valley Regional Value
(6.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Rio Grande Valley Region value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Cameron
Health / Family Planning
Value
Compared to:
County: Cameron Infants Born to Mothers with <12 Years Education
County: Cameron Infants Born to Mothers with <12 Years Education
23.4%
(2019)
Compared to:
TX Counties
The distribution is based on data from 209 Texas counties.
TX Value
(16.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
US Value
(12.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Rio Grande Valley Regional Value
(31.6% in 2015)
The regional value is compared to the Rio Grande Valley Region value.
Prior Value
(24.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Cameron Teen Births
County: Cameron Teen Births
4.3%
(2019)
Compared to:
TX Counties
(2014)
The distribution is based on data from 227 Texas counties.
TX Value
(2.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
US Value
(2.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Health Statistics
Rio Grande Valley Regional Value
(4.1% in 2015)
The regional value is compared to the Rio Grande Valley Region value.
Prior Value
(4.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Cameron
Health / Health Care Access & Quality
Value
Compared to:
County: Cameron Adults Unable to Afford to See a Doctor
County: Cameron Adults Unable to Afford to See a Doctor
30.0%
(2017)
Compared to:
TX Value
(19.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
Prior Value
(24.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Cameron Adults who have had a Routine Checkup
County: Cameron Adults who have had a Routine Checkup
71.2%
(2021)
Compared to:
TX Counties
The distribution is based on data from 254 Texas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
US Value
(73.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Rio Grande Valley Regional Value
(69.4% in 2020)
The regional value is compared to the Rio Grande Valley Region value.
County: Cameron Adults with Health Insurance: 18-64
County: Cameron Adults with Health Insurance: 18-64
61.4%
(2021)
Compared to:
TX Counties
The distribution is based on data from 254 Texas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,140 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
TX Value
(75.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
Rio Grande Valley Regional Value
(58.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Rio Grande Valley Region value.
Prior Value
(61.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Cameron Children with Health Insurance
County: Cameron Children with Health Insurance
86.3%
(2021)
Compared to:
TX Counties
The distribution is based on data from 254 Texas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,140 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
TX Value
(88.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
Rio Grande Valley Regional Value
(87.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Rio Grande Valley Region value.
Prior Value
(86.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Cameron Community Spending on Health Care
County: Cameron Community Spending on Health Care
7.4%
(2023)
Compared to:
TX Value
(7.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
US Value
(8.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Rio Grande Valley Regional Value
(7.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Rio Grande Valley Region value.
Prior Value
(7.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
County: Cameron Health Insurance Spending-to-Income Ratio
County: Cameron Health Insurance Spending-to-Income Ratio
8.3%
(2023)
Compared to:
TX Counties
The distribution is based on data from 254 Texas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
TX Value
(6.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
Rio Grande Valley Regional Value
(8.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Rio Grande Valley Region value.
Prior Value
(8.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
County: Cameron Medicare Healthcare Costs
County: Cameron Medicare Healthcare Costs
$11,880
Dollars per enrollee
(2015)
Compared to:
TX Value
($11,121)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
US Value
($9,729)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
($11,864)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Cameron Non-Physician Primary Care Provider Rate
County: Cameron Non-Physician Primary Care Provider Rate
96
Providers per 100,000 population
(2023)
Compared to:
TX Counties
The distribution is based on data from 252 Texas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
TX Value
(109)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
Prior Value
(89)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Cameron Persons with Health Insurance
County: Cameron Persons with Health Insurance
69.9%
(2021)
Compared to:
TX Counties
The distribution is based on data from 254 Texas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,140 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
TX Value
(79.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
Rio Grande Valley Regional Value
(69.7% in 2017)
The regional value is compared to the Rio Grande Valley Region value.
Prior Value
(70.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(92.4%)
<div>AHS-01: Increase the proportion of people with health insurance <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong></div>
County: Cameron Persons with Private Health Insurance Only
County: Cameron Persons with Private Health Insurance Only
36.7%
(2022)
Compared to:
TX Value
(53.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
US Value
(54.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(34.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Cameron Persons with Public Health Insurance Only
County: Cameron Persons with Public Health Insurance Only
33.8%
(2022)
Compared to:
TX Value
(20.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
US Value
(24.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(32.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Cameron Preventable Hospital Stays: Medicare Population
County: Cameron Preventable Hospital Stays: Medicare Population
3,244.0
Discharges per 100,000 Medicare enrollees
(2022)
Compared to:
TX Counties
The distribution is based on data from 254 Texas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
TX Value
(2,980.0)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
US Value
(2,677.0)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(3,231.0)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Cameron Primary Care Provider Rate
County: Cameron Primary Care Provider Rate
49
Providers per 100,000 population
(2021)
Compared to:
TX Counties
The distribution is based on data from 231 Texas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,984 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
TX Value
(60)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
Rio Grande Valley Regional Value
(46)
The regional value is compared to the Rio Grande Valley Region value.
Prior Value
(52)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Cameron
Health / Heart Disease & Stroke
Value
Compared to:
County: Cameron Adults who Experienced a Stroke
County: Cameron Adults who Experienced a Stroke
3.7%
(2021)
Compared to:
TX Counties
The distribution is based on data from 254 Texas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
US Value
(3.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Rio Grande Valley Regional Value
(3.5% in 2020)
The regional value is compared to the Rio Grande Valley Region value.
County: Cameron Adults who Experienced Coronary Heart Disease
County: Cameron Adults who Experienced Coronary Heart Disease
6.9%
(2021)
Compared to:
TX Counties
The distribution is based on data from 254 Texas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
US Value
(6.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Rio Grande Valley Regional Value
(7.2% in 2020)
The regional value is compared to the Rio Grande Valley Region value.
County: Cameron Adults who Have Taken Medications for High Blood Pressure
County: Cameron Adults who Have Taken Medications for High Blood Pressure
77.3%
(2021)
Compared to:
TX Counties
The distribution is based on data from 254 Texas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
US Value
(78.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Rio Grande Valley Regional Value
(74.7% in 2019)
The regional value is compared to the Rio Grande Valley Region value.
County: Cameron Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Cerebrovascular Disease (Stroke)
County: Cameron Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Cerebrovascular Disease (Stroke)
29.4
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
TX Counties
The distribution is based on data from 155 Texas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,338 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
TX Value
(40.1)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
US Value
(37.6)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Rio Grande Valley Regional Value
(27.0)
The regional value is compared to the Rio Grande Valley Region value.
Prior Value
(29.3)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(33.4)
County: Cameron Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Coronary Heart Disease
County: Cameron Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Coronary Heart Disease
108.6
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
TX Counties
The distribution is based on data from 207 Texas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,852 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
TX Value
(93.7)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
US Value
(90.2)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Rio Grande Valley Regional Value
(117.6)
The regional value is compared to the Rio Grande Valley Region value.
Prior Value
(107.3)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(71.1)
County: Cameron Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Heart Attack
County: Cameron Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Heart Attack
120.7
Deaths per 100,000 population 35+ years
(2020)
Compared to:
TX Counties
The distribution is based on data from 140 Texas counties.
TX Value
(63.2)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
Prior Value
(103.3)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Cameron Atrial Fibrillation: Medicare Population
County: Cameron Atrial Fibrillation: Medicare Population
11.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
TX Counties
The distribution is based on data from 254 Texas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
TX Value
(14.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
US Value
(14.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Rio Grande Valley Regional Value
(5.8% in 2018)
The regional value is compared to the Rio Grande Valley Region value.
Prior Value
(10.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Cameron Cholesterol Test History
County: Cameron Cholesterol Test History
81.0%
(2021)
Compared to:
TX Counties
The distribution is based on data from 254 Texas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
US Value
(86.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Rio Grande Valley Regional Value
(80.6% in 2019)
The regional value is compared to the Rio Grande Valley Region value.
County: Cameron Heart Failure: Medicare Population
County: Cameron Heart Failure: Medicare Population
11.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
TX Counties
The distribution is based on data from 254 Texas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
TX Value
(12.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
US Value
(11.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Rio Grande Valley Regional Value
(18.2% in 2018)
The regional value is compared to the Rio Grande Valley Region value.
Prior Value
(10.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Cameron High Blood Pressure Prevalence
County: Cameron High Blood Pressure Prevalence
34.0%
(2021)
Compared to:
TX Counties
The distribution is based on data from 254 Texas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
US Value
(32.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Rio Grande Valley Regional Value
(33.7% in 2019)
The regional value is compared to the Rio Grande Valley Region value.
HP 2030 Target
(41.9%)
County: Cameron High Cholesterol Prevalence: Past 5 Years
County: Cameron High Cholesterol Prevalence: Past 5 Years
36.6%
(2021)
Compared to:
TX Counties
The distribution is based on data from 254 Texas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
US Value
(36.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Rio Grande Valley Regional Value
(33.0% in 2019)
The regional value is compared to the Rio Grande Valley Region value.
County: Cameron Hyperlipidemia: Medicare Population
County: Cameron Hyperlipidemia: Medicare Population
64.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
TX Counties
The distribution is based on data from 254 Texas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
TX Value
(65.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
US Value
(65.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Rio Grande Valley Regional Value
(62.0% in 2018)
The regional value is compared to the Rio Grande Valley Region value.
Prior Value
(62.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Cameron Hypertension: Medicare Population
County: Cameron Hypertension: Medicare Population
62.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
TX Counties
The distribution is based on data from 254 Texas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
TX Value
(66.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
US Value
(65.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Rio Grande Valley Regional Value
(67.5% in 2018)
The regional value is compared to the Rio Grande Valley Region value.
Prior Value
(62.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Cameron Ischemic Heart Disease: Medicare Population
County: Cameron Ischemic Heart Disease: Medicare Population
21.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
TX Counties
The distribution is based on data from 254 Texas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
TX Value
(22.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
US Value
(21.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Rio Grande Valley Regional Value
(35.4% in 2018)
The regional value is compared to the Rio Grande Valley Region value.
Prior Value
(21.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Cameron Stroke: Medicare Population
County: Cameron Stroke: Medicare Population
5.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
TX Counties
The distribution is based on data from 254 Texas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
TX Value
(6.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
US Value
(6.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Rio Grande Valley Regional Value
(4.8% in 2018)
The regional value is compared to the Rio Grande Valley Region value.
Prior Value
(5.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Cameron
Health / Immunizations & Infectious Diseases
Value
Compared to:
County: Cameron Adults 65+ with Influenza Vaccination
County: Cameron Adults 65+ with Influenza Vaccination
71.1%
(2017)
Compared to:
TX Value
(59.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
Prior Value
(69.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
County: Cameron Adults 65+ with Pneumonia Vaccination
County: Cameron Adults 65+ with Pneumonia Vaccination
69.5%
(2017)
Compared to:
TX Value
(74.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
Prior Value
(66.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
County: Cameron Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Influenza and Pneumonia
County: Cameron Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Influenza and Pneumonia
10.9
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 1,449 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
TX Value
(12.1)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
US Value
(13.4)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Rio Grande Valley Regional Value
(11.2)
The regional value is compared to the Rio Grande Valley Region value.
Prior Value
(10.0)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Cameron Conscientious Exemptions from Immunizations
County: Cameron Conscientious Exemptions from Immunizations
0.4%
(2022-2023)
Compared to:
TX Counties
The distribution is based on data from 252 Texas counties.
TX Value
(2.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
Prior Value
(0.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Cameron COVID-19 Daily Average Case-Fatality Rate
County: Cameron COVID-19 Daily Average Case-Fatality Rate
0.3
Deaths per 100 cases
(Mar 3, 2023)
Compared to:
TX Counties
(Mar 11, 2022)
The distribution is based on data from 233 Texas counties.
U.S. Counties
(Mar 25, 2022)
The distribution is based on data from 2,811 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
TX Value
(1.8)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
US Value
(1.7)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(0.0)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Cameron COVID-19 Daily Average Incidence Rate
County: Cameron COVID-19 Daily Average Incidence Rate
11.04
Cases per 100,000 population
(Mar 3, 2023)
Compared to:
TX Counties
The distribution is based on data from 254 Texas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,142 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
TX Value
(13.90)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
US Value
(10.97)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(10.57)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Cameron Flu Vaccinations: Medicare Population
County: Cameron Flu Vaccinations: Medicare Population
40.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
TX Counties
The distribution is based on data from 254 Texas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
TX Value
(46.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
US Value
(50.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(38.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Cameron Persons Fully Vaccinated Against COVID-19
County: Cameron Persons Fully Vaccinated Against COVID-19
82.0%
(May 10, 2023)
Compared to:
TX Counties
The distribution is based on data from 254 Texas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,125 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Prior Value
(81.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Cameron Pneumonia Vaccinations: Medicare Population
County: Cameron Pneumonia Vaccinations: Medicare Population
6.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
TX Counties
The distribution is based on data from 254 Texas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
TX Value
(8.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
US Value
(8.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(5.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Cameron Tuberculosis Incidence Rate
County: Cameron Tuberculosis Incidence Rate
8.9
Cases per 100,000 population
(2017-2021)
Compared to:
TX Counties
The distribution is based on data from 254 Texas counties.
TX Value
(3.9)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
US Value
(2.4 in 2021)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Rio Grande Valley Regional Value
(25.2 in 2013-2017)
The regional value is compared to the Rio Grande Valley Region value.
Prior Value
(8.9)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(1.4)
County: Cameron
Health / Maternal, Fetal & Infant Health
Value
Compared to:
County: Cameron Babies with Low Birthweight
County: Cameron Babies with Low Birthweight
7.8%
(2015)
Compared to:
TX Counties
The distribution is based on data from 210 Texas counties.
TX Value
(8.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
US Value
(8.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Rio Grande Valley Regional Value
(8.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Rio Grande Valley Region value.
Prior Value
(8.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Cameron Babies with Very Low Birthweight
County: Cameron Babies with Very Low Birthweight
1.3%
(2015)
Compared to:
TX Value
(1.4% in 2013)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
US Value
(1.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Rio Grande Valley Regional Value
(1.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Rio Grande Valley Region value.
Prior Value
(1.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Cameron Infant Mortality Rate
County: Cameron Infant Mortality Rate
5.2
Deaths per 1,000 live births
(2019)
Compared to:
TX Counties
(2015)
The distribution is based on data from 165 Texas counties.
TX Value
(5.5)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
US Value
(5.6)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Rio Grande Valley Regional Value
(4.8 in 2015)
The regional value is compared to the Rio Grande Valley Region value.
Prior Value
(5.4)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(5.0)
<div>MICH-02: Reduce the rate of infant deaths <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong></div>
County: Cameron Mothers who Received Early Prenatal Care
County: Cameron Mothers who Received Early Prenatal Care
75.4%
(2019)
Compared to:
TX Counties
The distribution is based on data from 253 Texas counties.
TX Value
(61.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
US Value
(75.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Rio Grande Valley Regional Value
(53.4% in 2015)
The regional value is compared to the Rio Grande Valley Region value.
Prior Value
(75.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Cameron Preterm Births
County: Cameron Preterm Births
16.5%
(2019)
Compared to:
TX Counties
The distribution is based on data from 190 Texas counties.
TX Value
(13.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
Rio Grande Valley Regional Value
(15.2% in 2015)
The regional value is compared to the Rio Grande Valley Region value.
Prior Value
(16.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(9.4%)
County: Cameron
Health / Mental Health & Mental Disorders
Value
Compared to:
County: Cameron Adults Ever Diagnosed with Depression
County: Cameron Adults Ever Diagnosed with Depression
18.9%
(2021)
Compared to:
TX Counties
The distribution is based on data from 254 Texas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
US Value
(19.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Rio Grande Valley Regional Value
(19.9% in 2020)
The regional value is compared to the Rio Grande Valley Region value.
County: Cameron Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Suicide
County: Cameron Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Suicide
8.2
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 1,307 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
TX Value
(13.5)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
US Value
(13.9)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Rio Grande Valley Regional Value
(7.0)
The regional value is compared to the Rio Grande Valley Region value.
Prior Value
(9.1)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(12.8)
<div>MHMD-01: Reduce the suicide rate <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong></div>
County: Cameron Depression: Medicare Population
County: Cameron Depression: Medicare Population
14.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
TX Counties
The distribution is based on data from 254 Texas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
TX Value
(17.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
US Value
(16.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Rio Grande Valley Regional Value
(21.4% in 2018)
The regional value is compared to the Rio Grande Valley Region value.
Prior Value
(13.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Cameron Frequent Mental Distress
County: Cameron Frequent Mental Distress
15.1%
(2019)
Compared to:
TX Counties
The distribution is based on data from 254 Texas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,121 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
TX Value
(12.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
US Value
(14.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(15.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
County: Cameron Mental Health Provider Rate
County: Cameron Mental Health Provider Rate
89
Providers per 100,000 population
(2023)
Compared to:
TX Counties
The distribution is based on data from 220 Texas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,956 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
TX Value
(157)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
Rio Grande Valley Regional Value
(82)
The regional value is compared to the Rio Grande Valley Region value.
Prior Value
(79)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Cameron Poor Mental Health: 14+ Days
County: Cameron Poor Mental Health: 14+ Days
16.9%
(2021)
Compared to:
TX Counties
The distribution is based on data from 254 Texas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
US Value
(14.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Rio Grande Valley Regional Value
(15.9% in 2020)
The regional value is compared to the Rio Grande Valley Region value.
County: Cameron Poor Mental Health: 5+ Days
County: Cameron Poor Mental Health: 5+ Days
16.5%
(2015)
Compared to:
TX Value
(18.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
Prior Value
(16.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Cameron Poor Mental Health: Average Number of Days
County: Cameron Poor Mental Health: Average Number of Days
5.5
Days
(2021)
Compared to:
TX Counties
The distribution is based on data from 254 Texas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
TX Value
(4.6)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
US Value
(4.8)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(5.0)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Cameron
Health / Mortality Data
Value
Compared to:
County: Cameron Life Expectancy
County: Cameron Life Expectancy
77.3
Years
(2019-2021)
Compared to:
TX Counties
The distribution is based on data from 237 Texas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,070 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
TX Value
(77.2)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
US Value
(77.6)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
County: Cameron
Health / Nutrition & Healthy Eating
Value
Compared to:
County: Cameron Adult Fruit and Vegetable Consumption
County: Cameron Adult Fruit and Vegetable Consumption
35.4%
(2017)
Compared to:
TX Value
(38.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
Prior Value
(17.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Cameron Adult Fruit Consumption
County: Cameron Adult Fruit Consumption
61.6%
(2017)
Compared to:
TX Value
(64.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
County: Cameron Adult Vegetable Consumption
County: Cameron Adult Vegetable Consumption
78.7%
(2017)
Compared to:
TX Value
(85.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
County: Cameron
Health / Older Adults
Value
Compared to:
County: Cameron Adult Day Care Spending-to-Income Ratio
County: Cameron Adult Day Care Spending-to-Income Ratio
27.3%
(2023)
Compared to:
TX Counties
The distribution is based on data from 254 Texas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
TX Value
(15.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
Rio Grande Valley Regional Value
(28.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Rio Grande Valley Region value.
Prior Value
(27.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
County: Cameron Adults 65+ who Received Recommended Preventive Services: Females
County: Cameron Adults 65+ who Received Recommended Preventive Services: Females
27.3%
(2020)
Compared to:
TX Counties
The distribution is based on data from 254 Texas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
US Value
(37.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Rio Grande Valley Regional Value
(27.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Rio Grande Valley Region value.
County: Cameron Adults 65+ who Received Recommended Preventive Services: Males
County: Cameron Adults 65+ who Received Recommended Preventive Services: Males
33.8%
(2020)
Compared to:
TX Counties
The distribution is based on data from 254 Texas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
US Value
(43.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Rio Grande Valley Regional Value
(31.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Rio Grande Valley Region value.
County: Cameron Adults 65+ with a Disability
County: Cameron Adults 65+ with a Disability
39.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
TX Value
(35.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
US Value
(33.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Rio Grande Valley Regional Value
(43.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Rio Grande Valley Region value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Cameron Adults 65+ with a Hearing Difficulty
County: Cameron Adults 65+ with a Hearing Difficulty
14.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
TX Value
(14.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
US Value
(13.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Rio Grande Valley Regional Value
(17.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Rio Grande Valley Region value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Cameron Adults 65+ with a Self-Care Difficulty
County: Cameron Adults 65+ with a Self-Care Difficulty
15.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
TX Value
(8.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
US Value
(7.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Rio Grande Valley Regional Value
(16.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Rio Grande Valley Region value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Cameron Adults 65+ with a Vision Difficulty
County: Cameron Adults 65+ with a Vision Difficulty
9.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
TX Value
(7.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
US Value
(6.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Rio Grande Valley Regional Value
(11.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Rio Grande Valley Region value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Cameron Adults 65+ with an Independent Living Difficulty
County: Cameron Adults 65+ with an Independent Living Difficulty
18.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
TX Value
(14.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
US Value
(13.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Rio Grande Valley Regional Value
(20.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Rio Grande Valley Region value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Cameron Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Alzheimer's Disease
County: Cameron Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Alzheimer's Disease
35.9
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
TX Counties
The distribution is based on data from 160 Texas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,140 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
TX Value
(40.6)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
US Value
(31.0)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Rio Grande Valley Regional Value
(38.1)
The regional value is compared to the Rio Grande Valley Region value.
Prior Value
(30.2)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Cameron Alzheimer's Disease or Dementia: Medicare Population
County: Cameron Alzheimer's Disease or Dementia: Medicare Population
7.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
TX Counties
The distribution is based on data from 254 Texas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
TX Value
(7.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
US Value
(6.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Rio Grande Valley Regional Value
(18.7% in 2018)
The regional value is compared to the Rio Grande Valley Region value.
Prior Value
(7.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Cameron
Health / Oral Health
Value
Compared to:
County: Cameron Adults 65+ with Total Tooth Loss
County: Cameron Adults 65+ with Total Tooth Loss
13.3%
(2020)
Compared to:
TX Counties
The distribution is based on data from 254 Texas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
US Value
(13.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Rio Grande Valley Regional Value
(13.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Rio Grande Valley Region value.
County: Cameron Adults who Visited a Dentist
County: Cameron Adults who Visited a Dentist
47.3%
(2020)
Compared to:
TX Counties
The distribution is based on data from 254 Texas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
US Value
(64.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Rio Grande Valley Regional Value
(48.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Rio Grande Valley Region value.
County: Cameron Dentist Rate
County: Cameron Dentist Rate
32
Dentists per 100,000 population
(2022)
Compared to:
TX Counties
The distribution is based on data from 242 Texas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,054 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
TX Value
(63)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
Rio Grande Valley Regional Value
(30)
The regional value is compared to the Rio Grande Valley Region value.
Prior Value
(31)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Cameron
Health / Other Conditions
Value
Compared to:
County: Cameron Adults with Arthritis
County: Cameron Adults with Arthritis
18.8%
(2021)
Compared to:
TX Counties
The distribution is based on data from 254 Texas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
US Value
(25.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Rio Grande Valley Regional Value
(19.9% in 2020)
The regional value is compared to the Rio Grande Valley Region value.
County: Cameron Adults with Kidney Disease
County: Cameron Adults with Kidney Disease
4.0%
(2021)
Compared to:
TX Counties
The distribution is based on data from 254 Texas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
US Value
(3.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Rio Grande Valley Regional Value
(3.9% in 2020)
The regional value is compared to the Rio Grande Valley Region value.
County: Cameron Chronic Kidney Disease: Medicare Population
County: Cameron Chronic Kidney Disease: Medicare Population
21.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
TX Counties
The distribution is based on data from 254 Texas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
TX Value
(18.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
US Value
(18.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Rio Grande Valley Regional Value
(40.5% in 2018)
The regional value is compared to the Rio Grande Valley Region value.
Prior Value
(21.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Cameron Osteoporosis: Medicare Population
County: Cameron Osteoporosis: Medicare Population
10.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
TX Counties
The distribution is based on data from 254 Texas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
TX Value
(11.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
US Value
(11.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Rio Grande Valley Regional Value
(11.0% in 2018)
The regional value is compared to the Rio Grande Valley Region value.
Prior Value
(9.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Cameron Rheumatoid Arthritis or Osteoarthritis: Medicare Population
County: Cameron Rheumatoid Arthritis or Osteoarthritis: Medicare Population
29.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
TX Counties
The distribution is based on data from 254 Texas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
TX Value
(35.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
US Value
(35.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Rio Grande Valley Regional Value
(39.8% in 2018)
The regional value is compared to the Rio Grande Valley Region value.
Prior Value
(28.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Cameron
Health / Physical Activity
Value
Compared to:
County: Cameron Adults 20+ who are Sedentary
County: Cameron Adults 20+ who are Sedentary
26.7%
(2021)
Compared to:
TX Counties
The distribution is based on data from 254 Texas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Prior Value
(26.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Cameron Adults Engaging in Physical Leisure Activity
County: Cameron Adults Engaging in Physical Leisure Activity
68.2%
(2017)
Compared to:
TX Value
(67.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
County: Cameron Adults who are Inactive
County: Cameron Adults who are Inactive
40.5%
(2017)
Compared to:
TX Value
(38.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
County: Cameron Adults who are Insufficiently Active
County: Cameron Adults who are Insufficiently Active
22.2%
(2017)
Compared to:
TX Value
(19.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
County: Cameron Adults who meet the U.S. Strength Recommendations
County: Cameron Adults who meet the U.S. Strength Recommendations
23.5%
(2017)
Compared to:
TX Value
(29.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
County: Cameron Adults who meet U.S. Aerobic and Strength Guidelines
County: Cameron Adults who meet U.S. Aerobic and Strength Guidelines
12.0%
(2017)
Compared to:
TX Value
(16.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
County: Cameron
Health / Prevention & Safety
Value
Compared to:
County: Cameron Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Falls
County: Cameron Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Falls
3.4
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 988 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
TX Value
(8.2)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
US Value
(9.8)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Rio Grande Valley Regional Value
(2.8)
The regional value is compared to the Rio Grande Valley Region value.
Prior Value
(2.7)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Cameron Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Firearms
County: Cameron Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Firearms
6.2
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 1,083 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
TX Value
(12.6)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
US Value
(12.0)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(5.2)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(10.7)
County: Cameron Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Unintentional Injuries
County: Cameron Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Unintentional Injuries
24.5
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
TX Counties
The distribution is based on data from 164 Texas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,454 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
TX Value
(40.6)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
US Value
(51.6)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Rio Grande Valley Regional Value
(24.0)
The regional value is compared to the Rio Grande Valley Region value.
Prior Value
(23.4)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(43.2)
County: Cameron
Health / Respiratory Diseases
Value
Compared to:
County: Cameron Adults with COPD
County: Cameron Adults with COPD
6.8%
Percent of adults
(2021)
Compared to:
TX Counties
The distribution is based on data from 254 Texas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
US Value
(6.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Rio Grande Valley Regional Value
(6.4% in 2020)
The regional value is compared to the Rio Grande Valley Region value.
County: Cameron Adults with Current Asthma
County: Cameron Adults with Current Asthma
9.1%
(2021)
Compared to:
TX Counties
The distribution is based on data from 254 Texas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
US Value
(9.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Rio Grande Valley Regional Value
(8.8% in 2020)
The regional value is compared to the Rio Grande Valley Region value.
County: Cameron Asthma: Medicare Population
County: Cameron Asthma: Medicare Population
4.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
TX Counties
The distribution is based on data from 254 Texas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
TX Value
(7.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
US Value
(7.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Rio Grande Valley Regional Value
(4.6% in 2018)
The regional value is compared to the Rio Grande Valley Region value.
Prior Value
(4.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Cameron COPD: Medicare Population
County: Cameron COPD: Medicare Population
11.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
TX Counties
The distribution is based on data from 254 Texas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
TX Value
(11.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
US Value
(11.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Rio Grande Valley Regional Value
(13.1% in 2018)
The regional value is compared to the Rio Grande Valley Region value.
Prior Value
(11.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Cameron
Health / Sexually Transmitted Infections
Value
Compared to:
County: Cameron Chlamydia Incidence Rate
County: Cameron Chlamydia Incidence Rate
489.3
Cases per 100,000 population
(2018)
Compared to:
TX Counties
The distribution is based on data from 254 Texas counties.
TX Value
(508.2)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
US Value
(539.9)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is National Center for HIV/AIDS, Viral Hepatitis, STD, and TB Prevention
Rio Grande Valley Regional Value
(453.4 in 2017)
The regional value is compared to the Rio Grande Valley Region value.
Prior Value
(491.6)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Cameron Gonorrhea Incidence Rate
County: Cameron Gonorrhea Incidence Rate
64.2
Cases per 100,000 population
(2018)
Compared to:
TX Counties
The distribution is based on data from 254 Texas counties.
TX Value
(163.6)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
US Value
(179.1)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is National Center for HIV/AIDS, Viral Hepatitis, STD, and TB Prevention
Rio Grande Valley Regional Value
(61.6 in 2017)
The regional value is compared to the Rio Grande Valley Region value.
Prior Value
(66.6)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Cameron HIV Diagnosis Rate
County: Cameron HIV Diagnosis Rate
7.8
Cases per 100,000 population
(2019)
Compared to:
TX Counties
The distribution is based on data from 254 Texas counties.
TX Value
(14.5)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
Rio Grande Valley Regional Value
(10.8 in 2017)
The regional value is compared to the Rio Grande Valley Region value.
Prior Value
(9.7)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Cameron Syphilis Incidence Rate
County: Cameron Syphilis Incidence Rate
0.5
Cases per 100,000 population
(2018)
Compared to:
TX Value
(8.8)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
US Value
(10.8)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is National Center for HIV/AIDS, Viral Hepatitis, STD, and TB Prevention
Rio Grande Valley Regional Value
(37.2 in 2017)
The regional value is compared to the Rio Grande Valley Region value.
Prior Value
(0.5)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Cameron
Health / Tobacco Use
Value
Compared to:
County: Cameron Adults who Smoke
County: Cameron Adults who Smoke
9.9%
(2017)
Compared to:
TX Value
(15.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
Prior Value
(10.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(6.1%)
<div>TU-02: Reduce current cigarette smoking in adults <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong></div>
County: Cameron Cigarette Spending-to-Income Ratio
County: Cameron Cigarette Spending-to-Income Ratio
2.6%
(2023)
Compared to:
TX Counties
The distribution is based on data from 254 Texas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
TX Value
(2.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
Rio Grande Valley Regional Value
(2.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Rio Grande Valley Region value.
Prior Value
(2.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
County: Cameron
Health / Weight Status
Value
Compared to:
County: Cameron Adults Who Are Obese
County: Cameron Adults Who Are Obese
42.7%
(2017)
Compared to:
TX Value
(33.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
US Value
(31.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System
Prior Value
(23.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Cameron Adults who are Overweight or Obese
County: Cameron Adults who are Overweight or Obese
74.4%
(2017)
Compared to:
TX Value
(69.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
Prior Value
(77.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Cameron
Health / Wellness & Lifestyle
Value
Compared to:
County: Cameron Frequent Physical Distress
County: Cameron Frequent Physical Distress
16.9%
(2019)
Compared to:
TX Counties
The distribution is based on data from 254 Texas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,121 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
TX Value
(10.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
US Value
(12.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(17.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
County: Cameron Insufficient Sleep
County: Cameron Insufficient Sleep
32.8%
(2020)
Compared to:
TX Counties
The distribution is based on data from 253 Texas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,140 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
TX Value
(33.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
US Value
(33.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(39.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
HP 2030 Target
(26.7%)
County: Cameron Poor Physical Health: 14+ Days
County: Cameron Poor Physical Health: 14+ Days
14.8%
(2021)
Compared to:
TX Counties
The distribution is based on data from 254 Texas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
US Value
(10.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Rio Grande Valley Regional Value
(15.0% in 2020)
The regional value is compared to the Rio Grande Valley Region value.
County: Cameron Poor Physical Health: 5+ Days
County: Cameron Poor Physical Health: 5+ Days
84.3%
(2016)
Compared to:
TX Value
(81.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
Prior Value
(18.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Cameron Poor Physical Health: Average Number of Days
County: Cameron Poor Physical Health: Average Number of Days
4.3
Days
(2021)
Compared to:
TX Counties
The distribution is based on data from 254 Texas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
TX Value
(3.3)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
US Value
(3.3)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(4.5)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Cameron Self-Reported General Health Assessment: Poor or Fair
County: Cameron Self-Reported General Health Assessment: Poor or Fair
29.4%
(2021)
Compared to:
TX Counties
The distribution is based on data from 254 Texas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
US Value
(16.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Rio Grande Valley Regional Value
(28.3% in 2020)
The regional value is compared to the Rio Grande Valley Region value.