Search for Indicators
All Data
Indicator Gauge Icon Legend
Legend Colors
Red is bad, green is good, blue is not statistically different/neutral.
Compared to Distribution
the value is in the best half of communities.
the value is in the 2nd worst quarter of communities.
the value is in the worst quarter of communities.
Compared to Target
meets target; 
does not meet target.
Compared to a Single Value
lower than the comparison value;
higher than the comparison value;
not statistically different from comparison value.
Trend
non-significant change over time; 
significant change over time; 
no change over time.
Compared to Prior Value
higher than the previous measurement period;
lower than the previous measurement period;
no statistically different change from previous measurement period.
Region: Rio Grande Valley
Health / Cancer
Value
Compared to:
Region: Rio Grande Valley Adults with Cancer
Region: Rio Grande Valley Adults with Cancer
4.6%
(2020)
Compared to:
TX Counties
The distribution is based on data from 254 Texas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
US Value
(6.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Region: Rio Grande Valley Cancer: Medicare Population
Region: Rio Grande Valley Cancer: Medicare Population
6.5%
(2018)
Compared to:
TX Counties
The distribution is based on data from 249 Texas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,119 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
TX Value
(7.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
US Value
(8.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(6.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Region: Rio Grande Valley Cervical Cancer Screening: 21-65
Region: Rio Grande Valley Cervical Cancer Screening: 21-65
71.8%
(2020)
Compared to:
TX Counties
The distribution is based on data from 254 Texas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
US Value
(82.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Region: Rio Grande Valley Colon Cancer Screening
Region: Rio Grande Valley Colon Cancer Screening
49.5%
(2018)
Compared to:
TX Counties
The distribution is based on data from 254 Texas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,142 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
US Value
(66.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Region: Rio Grande Valley Colon Cancer Screening: USPSTF Recommendation
Region: Rio Grande Valley Colon Cancer Screening: USPSTF Recommendation
56.9%
(2020)
Compared to:
TX Counties
The distribution is based on data from 254 Texas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
US Value
(72.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Region: Rio Grande Valley Mammogram in Past 2 Years: 50-74
Region: Rio Grande Valley Mammogram in Past 2 Years: 50-74
67.9%
(2020)
Compared to:
TX Counties
The distribution is based on data from 254 Texas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
US Value
(78.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
HP 2030 Target
(80.3%)
Region: Rio Grande Valley
Health / Children's Health
Value
Compared to:
Region: Rio Grande Valley Children with Acanthosis Nigricans
Region: Rio Grande Valley Children with Acanthosis Nigricans
8.0%
Percent of children
(2022-2023)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(8.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Region: Rio Grande Valley
Health / Diabetes
Value
Compared to:
Region: Rio Grande Valley Adults who have been Tested for High Blood Sugar or Diabetes: Past 3 Years
Region: Rio Grande Valley Adults who have been Tested for High Blood Sugar or Diabetes: Past 3 Years
48.1%
(2016)
Compared to:
TX Value
(55.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
Prior Value
(48.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Region: Rio Grande Valley Adults with Diabetes (CCHC)
Region: Rio Grande Valley Adults with Diabetes (CCHC)
24.9%
(2016-2018)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(23.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Region: Rio Grande Valley Adults with Diabetes (Clinic A)
Region: Rio Grande Valley Adults with Diabetes (Clinic A)
26.7%
(2017-2019)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(24.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Region: Rio Grande Valley Adults with Diabetes (Clinic B)
Region: Rio Grande Valley Adults with Diabetes (Clinic B)
38.2%
(2017-2019)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(55.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Region: Rio Grande Valley Adults with Diabetes (Clinic C)
Region: Rio Grande Valley Adults with Diabetes (Clinic C)
32.3%
(2019)
Compared to:
Community Target
(24.19%)
Region: Rio Grande Valley Adults with Diabetes (Clinic D)
Region: Rio Grande Valley Adults with Diabetes (Clinic D)
21.1%
(2019)
Compared to:
Community Target
(15.80%)
Region: Rio Grande Valley Adults with Prediabetes
Region: Rio Grande Valley Adults with Prediabetes
11.3%
(2015)
Compared to:
TX Value
(7.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
Prior Value
(4.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Region: Rio Grande Valley Adults with Prediabetes (CCHC)
Region: Rio Grande Valley Adults with Prediabetes (CCHC)
34.0%
(2016-2018)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(39.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Region: Rio Grande Valley Adults with Prediabetes (Clinic A)
Region: Rio Grande Valley Adults with Prediabetes (Clinic A)
18.8%
(2017-2019)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(24.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Region: Rio Grande Valley Adults with Prediabetes (Clinic B)
Region: Rio Grande Valley Adults with Prediabetes (Clinic B)
26.1%
(2017-2019)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(26.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Region: Rio Grande Valley Adults with Prediabetes (Clinic C)
Region: Rio Grande Valley Adults with Prediabetes (Clinic C)
17.6%
(2019)
Compared to:
Community Target
(13.81%)
Region: Rio Grande Valley Adults with Prediabetes (Clinic D)
Region: Rio Grande Valley Adults with Prediabetes (Clinic D)
3.8%
(2019)
Compared to:
Community Target
(2.83%)
Region: Rio Grande Valley Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Diabetes
Region: Rio Grande Valley Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Diabetes
33.3
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
TX Counties
The distribution is based on data from 133 Texas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 1,937 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
TX Value
(23.8)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
US Value
(22.6)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(29.3)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Region: Rio Grande Valley Diabetes: Medicare Population
Region: Rio Grande Valley Diabetes: Medicare Population
43.1%
(2018)
Compared to:
TX Counties
The distribution is based on data from 252 Texas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,143 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
TX Value
(28.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
US Value
(27.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(43.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Region: Rio Grande Valley
Health / Disabilities
Value
Compared to:
Region: Rio Grande Valley Adults with Disability Living in Poverty
Region: Rio Grande Valley Adults with Disability Living in Poverty
31.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
TX Counties
The distribution is based on data from 253 Texas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,132 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
TX Value
(22.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
US Value
(24.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Region: Rio Grande Valley Children with a Disability
Region: Rio Grande Valley Children with a Disability
5.5%
(2017-2021)
Compared to:
TX Value
(4.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
US Value
(4.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Region: Rio Grande Valley Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty
Region: Rio Grande Valley Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty
5.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
TX Value
(4.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
US Value
(5.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Region: Rio Grande Valley Persons with a Disability
Region: Rio Grande Valley Persons with a Disability
12.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
TX Value
(11.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
US Value
(12.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Region: Rio Grande Valley Persons with a Hearing Difficulty
Region: Rio Grande Valley Persons with a Hearing Difficulty
3.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
TX Value
(3.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
US Value
(3.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Region: Rio Grande Valley Persons with a Self-Care Difficulty
Region: Rio Grande Valley Persons with a Self-Care Difficulty
4.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
TX Value
(2.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
US Value
(2.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Region: Rio Grande Valley Persons with a Vision Difficulty
Region: Rio Grande Valley Persons with a Vision Difficulty
3.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
TX Value
(2.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
US Value
(2.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Region: Rio Grande Valley Persons with an Ambulatory Difficulty
Region: Rio Grande Valley Persons with an Ambulatory Difficulty
6.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
TX Value
(6.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
US Value
(6.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Region: Rio Grande Valley
Health / Family Planning
Value
Compared to:
Region: Rio Grande Valley Infants Born to Mothers with <12 Years Education
Region: Rio Grande Valley Infants Born to Mothers with <12 Years Education
31.6%
(2015)
Compared to:
TX Counties
The distribution is based on data from 213 Texas counties.
TX Value
(19.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
US Value
(14.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Prior Value
(0.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Region: Rio Grande Valley Teen Births
Region: Rio Grande Valley Teen Births
4.1%
(2015)
Compared to:
TX Counties
(2014)
The distribution is based on data from 227 Texas counties.
TX Value
(2.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
US Value
(3.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Health Statistics
Prior Value
(6.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Region: Rio Grande Valley
Health / Health Care Access & Quality
Value
Compared to:
Region: Rio Grande Valley Adults who have had a Routine Checkup
Region: Rio Grande Valley Adults who have had a Routine Checkup
69.4%
(2020)
Compared to:
TX Counties
The distribution is based on data from 254 Texas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
US Value
(74.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Region: Rio Grande Valley Adults with Health Insurance: 18-64
Region: Rio Grande Valley Adults with Health Insurance: 18-64
58.9%
(2021)
Compared to:
TX Counties
The distribution is based on data from 254 Texas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,140 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
TX Value
(75.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
Prior Value
(58.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Region: Rio Grande Valley Adults without Health Insurance
Region: Rio Grande Valley Adults without Health Insurance
49.6%
(2020)
Compared to:
TX Counties
The distribution is based on data from 254 Texas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
US Value
(15.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Region: Rio Grande Valley Children with Health Insurance
Region: Rio Grande Valley Children with Health Insurance
87.2%
(2021)
Compared to:
TX Counties
The distribution is based on data from 254 Texas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,140 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
TX Value
(88.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
Prior Value
(85.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Region: Rio Grande Valley Community Spending on Health Care
Region: Rio Grande Valley Community Spending on Health Care
7.2%
(2023)
Compared to:
TX Value
(7.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
US Value
(8.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(7.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Region: Rio Grande Valley Health Insurance Spending-to-Income Ratio
Region: Rio Grande Valley Health Insurance Spending-to-Income Ratio
8.3%
(2023)
Compared to:
TX Counties
The distribution is based on data from 254 Texas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
TX Value
(6.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
Prior Value
(9.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Region: Rio Grande Valley Persons with Health Insurance
Region: Rio Grande Valley Persons with Health Insurance
69.7%
(2017)
Compared to:
TX Counties
The distribution is based on data from 254 Texas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
TX Value
(80.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
Prior Value
(70.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(92.4%)
<div>AHS-01: Increase the proportion of people with health insurance <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong></div>
Region: Rio Grande Valley Primary Care Provider Rate
Region: Rio Grande Valley Primary Care Provider Rate
46
Providers per 100,000 population
(2021)
Compared to:
TX Counties
The distribution is based on data from 231 Texas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,984 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
TX Value
(60)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
Prior Value
(47)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Region: Rio Grande Valley
Health / Health Information Technology
Value
Compared to:
Region: Rio Grande Valley Households with an Internet Subscription
Region: Rio Grande Valley Households with an Internet Subscription
77.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
TX Counties
The distribution is based on data from 254 Texas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
TX Value
(88.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
US Value
(88.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Region: Rio Grande Valley Households with One or More Types of Computing Devices
Region: Rio Grande Valley Households with One or More Types of Computing Devices
89.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
TX Counties
The distribution is based on data from 254 Texas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
TX Value
(94.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
US Value
(94.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Region: Rio Grande Valley Persons with an Internet Subscription
Region: Rio Grande Valley Persons with an Internet Subscription
81.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
TX Counties
The distribution is based on data from 254 Texas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
TX Value
(90.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
US Value
(91.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Region: Rio Grande Valley
Health / Heart Disease & Stroke
Value
Compared to:
Region: Rio Grande Valley Adults who Experienced a Stroke
Region: Rio Grande Valley Adults who Experienced a Stroke
3.5%
(2020)
Compared to:
TX Counties
The distribution is based on data from 254 Texas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
US Value
(3.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Region: Rio Grande Valley Adults who Experienced Coronary Heart Disease
Region: Rio Grande Valley Adults who Experienced Coronary Heart Disease
7.2%
(2020)
Compared to:
TX Counties
The distribution is based on data from 254 Texas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
US Value
(6.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Region: Rio Grande Valley Adults who Have Taken Medications for High Blood Pressure
Region: Rio Grande Valley Adults who Have Taken Medications for High Blood Pressure
74.7%
(2019)
Compared to:
TX Counties
The distribution is based on data from 254 Texas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,121 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
US Value
(76.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Region: Rio Grande Valley Adults with High Cholesterol (CCHC)
Region: Rio Grande Valley Adults with High Cholesterol (CCHC)
26.4%
(2016-2018)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(27.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Region: Rio Grande Valley Adults with High Cholesterol (Clinic A)
Region: Rio Grande Valley Adults with High Cholesterol (Clinic A)
50.8%
(2017-2019)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(42.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Region: Rio Grande Valley Adults with High Cholesterol (Clinic B)
Region: Rio Grande Valley Adults with High Cholesterol (Clinic B)
20.7%
(2017-2019)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(24.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Region: Rio Grande Valley Adults with High Cholesterol (Clinic C)
Region: Rio Grande Valley Adults with High Cholesterol (Clinic C)
49.0%
(2019)
Compared to:
Community Target
(36.74%)
Region: Rio Grande Valley Adults with High Cholesterol (Clinic D)
Region: Rio Grande Valley Adults with High Cholesterol (Clinic D)
22.2%
(2019)
Compared to:
Community Target
(16.62%)
Region: Rio Grande Valley Adults with Hypertension (CCHC)
Region: Rio Grande Valley Adults with Hypertension (CCHC)
16.8%
(2016-2018)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(16.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Region: Rio Grande Valley Adults with Hypertension (Clinic A)
Region: Rio Grande Valley Adults with Hypertension (Clinic A)
29.3%
(2017-2019)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(28.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Region: Rio Grande Valley Adults with Hypertension (Clinic B)
Region: Rio Grande Valley Adults with Hypertension (Clinic B)
37.4%
(2017-2019)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(27.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Region: Rio Grande Valley Adults with Hypertension (Clinic C)
Region: Rio Grande Valley Adults with Hypertension (Clinic C)
34.2%
(2019)
Compared to:
Community Target
(25.64%)
Region: Rio Grande Valley Adults with Hypertension (Clinic D)
Region: Rio Grande Valley Adults with Hypertension (Clinic D)
37.1%
(2019)
Compared to:
Community Target
(27.85%)
Region: Rio Grande Valley Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Cerebrovascular Disease (Stroke)
Region: Rio Grande Valley Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Cerebrovascular Disease (Stroke)
27.0
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
TX Counties
The distribution is based on data from 155 Texas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,338 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
TX Value
(40.1)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
US Value
(37.6)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(26.4)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(33.4)
Region: Rio Grande Valley Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Coronary Heart Disease
Region: Rio Grande Valley Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Coronary Heart Disease
117.6
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
TX Counties
The distribution is based on data from 207 Texas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,852 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
TX Value
(93.7)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
US Value
(90.2)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(106.4)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(71.1)
Region: Rio Grande Valley Atrial Fibrillation: Medicare Population
Region: Rio Grande Valley Atrial Fibrillation: Medicare Population
5.8%
(2018)
Compared to:
TX Counties
The distribution is based on data from 252 Texas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,121 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
TX Value
(7.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
US Value
(8.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(5.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Region: Rio Grande Valley Cholesterol Test History
Region: Rio Grande Valley Cholesterol Test History
80.6%
(2019)
Compared to:
TX Counties
The distribution is based on data from 254 Texas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,121 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
US Value
(87.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Region: Rio Grande Valley Heart Failure: Medicare Population
Region: Rio Grande Valley Heart Failure: Medicare Population
18.2%
(2018)
Compared to:
TX Counties
The distribution is based on data from 251 Texas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,136 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
TX Value
(15.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
US Value
(14.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(17.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Region: Rio Grande Valley High Blood Pressure Prevalence
Region: Rio Grande Valley High Blood Pressure Prevalence
33.7%
(2019)
Compared to:
TX Counties
The distribution is based on data from 254 Texas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,121 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
US Value
(32.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
HP 2030 Target
(41.9%)
Region: Rio Grande Valley High Cholesterol Prevalence: Past 5 Years
Region: Rio Grande Valley High Cholesterol Prevalence: Past 5 Years
33.0%
(2019)
Compared to:
TX Counties
The distribution is based on data from 254 Texas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,121 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
US Value
(33.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Region: Rio Grande Valley Hyperlipidemia: Medicare Population
Region: Rio Grande Valley Hyperlipidemia: Medicare Population
62.0%
(2018)
Compared to:
TX Counties
The distribution is based on data from 252 Texas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,143 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
TX Value
(49.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
US Value
(47.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(56.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Region: Rio Grande Valley Hypertension: Medicare Population
Region: Rio Grande Valley Hypertension: Medicare Population
67.5%
(2018)
Compared to:
TX Counties
The distribution is based on data from 252 Texas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,143 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
TX Value
(59.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
US Value
(57.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(68.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Region: Rio Grande Valley Ischemic Heart Disease: Medicare Population
Region: Rio Grande Valley Ischemic Heart Disease: Medicare Population
35.4%
(2018)
Compared to:
TX Counties
The distribution is based on data from 251 Texas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,142 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
TX Value
(29.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
US Value
(26.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(36.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Region: Rio Grande Valley Stroke: Medicare Population
Region: Rio Grande Valley Stroke: Medicare Population
4.8%
(2018)
Compared to:
TX Counties
The distribution is based on data from 238 Texas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,037 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
TX Value
(4.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
US Value
(3.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(4.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Region: Rio Grande Valley
Health / Immunizations & Infectious Diseases
Value
Compared to:
Region: Rio Grande Valley Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Influenza and Pneumonia
Region: Rio Grande Valley Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Influenza and Pneumonia
11.2
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 1,449 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
TX Value
(12.1)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
US Value
(13.4)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(10.6)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Region: Rio Grande Valley Tuberculosis Incidence Rate
Region: Rio Grande Valley Tuberculosis Incidence Rate
25.2
Cases per 100,000 population
(2013-2017)
Compared to:
TX Counties
The distribution is based on data from 254 Texas counties.
TX Value
(4.5)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
US Value
(2.4 in 2021)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
HP 2030 Target
(1.4)
Region: Rio Grande Valley
Health / Maternal, Fetal & Infant Health
Value
Compared to:
Region: Rio Grande Valley Babies with Low Birthweight
Region: Rio Grande Valley Babies with Low Birthweight
8.3%
(2015)
Compared to:
TX Counties
The distribution is based on data from 210 Texas counties.
TX Value
(8.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
US Value
(8.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Prior Value
(39.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Region: Rio Grande Valley Babies with Very Low Birthweight
Region: Rio Grande Valley Babies with Very Low Birthweight
1.2%
(2015)
Compared to:
TX Value
(1.4% in 2013)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
US Value
(1.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Prior Value
(15.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Region: Rio Grande Valley Infant Mortality Rate
Region: Rio Grande Valley Infant Mortality Rate
4.8
Deaths per 1,000 live births
(2015)
Compared to:
TX Counties
The distribution is based on data from 165 Texas counties.
TX Value
(5.6)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
US Value
(5.9)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
HP 2030 Target
(5.0)
<div>MICH-02: Reduce the rate of infant deaths <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong></div>
Region: Rio Grande Valley Mothers who Received Early Prenatal Care
Region: Rio Grande Valley Mothers who Received Early Prenatal Care
53.4%
(2015)
Compared to:
TX Counties
The distribution is based on data from 240 Texas counties.
TX Value
(59.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
US Value
(77.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Prior Value
(0.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Region: Rio Grande Valley Preterm Births
Region: Rio Grande Valley Preterm Births
15.2%
(2015)
Compared to:
TX Counties
The distribution is based on data from 193 Texas counties.
TX Value
(11.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
Prior Value
(0.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(9.4%)
Region: Rio Grande Valley
Health / Mental Health & Mental Disorders
Value
Compared to:
Region: Rio Grande Valley Adults Ever Diagnosed with Depression
Region: Rio Grande Valley Adults Ever Diagnosed with Depression
19.9%
(2020)
Compared to:
TX Counties
The distribution is based on data from 254 Texas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
US Value
(18.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Region: Rio Grande Valley Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Suicide
Region: Rio Grande Valley Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Suicide
7.0
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 1,307 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
TX Value
(13.5)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
US Value
(13.9)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(7.6)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(12.8)
<div>MHMD-01: Reduce the suicide rate <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong></div>
Region: Rio Grande Valley Depression: Medicare Population
Region: Rio Grande Valley Depression: Medicare Population
21.4%
(2018)
Compared to:
TX Counties
The distribution is based on data from 251 Texas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,135 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
TX Value
(18.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
US Value
(18.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(19.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Region: Rio Grande Valley Mental Health Provider Rate
Region: Rio Grande Valley Mental Health Provider Rate
82
Providers per 100,000 population
(2023)
Compared to:
TX Counties
The distribution is based on data from 220 Texas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,956 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
TX Value
(157)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
Prior Value
(75)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Region: Rio Grande Valley Poor Mental Health: 14+ Days
Region: Rio Grande Valley Poor Mental Health: 14+ Days
15.9%
(2020)
Compared to:
TX Counties
The distribution is based on data from 254 Texas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
US Value
(13.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Region: Rio Grande Valley
Health / Older Adults
Value
Compared to:
Region: Rio Grande Valley Adult Day Care Spending-to-Income Ratio
Region: Rio Grande Valley Adult Day Care Spending-to-Income Ratio
28.3%
(2023)
Compared to:
TX Counties
The distribution is based on data from 254 Texas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
TX Value
(15.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
Prior Value
(30.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Region: Rio Grande Valley Adults 65+ who Received Recommended Preventive Services: Females
Region: Rio Grande Valley Adults 65+ who Received Recommended Preventive Services: Females
27.0%
(2020)
Compared to:
TX Counties
The distribution is based on data from 254 Texas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
US Value
(37.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Region: Rio Grande Valley Adults 65+ who Received Recommended Preventive Services: Males
Region: Rio Grande Valley Adults 65+ who Received Recommended Preventive Services: Males
31.2%
(2020)
Compared to:
TX Counties
The distribution is based on data from 254 Texas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
US Value
(43.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Region: Rio Grande Valley Adults 65+ with a Disability
Region: Rio Grande Valley Adults 65+ with a Disability
43.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
TX Value
(35.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
US Value
(33.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Region: Rio Grande Valley Adults 65+ with a Hearing Difficulty
Region: Rio Grande Valley Adults 65+ with a Hearing Difficulty
17.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
TX Value
(14.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
US Value
(13.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Region: Rio Grande Valley Adults 65+ with a Self-Care Difficulty
Region: Rio Grande Valley Adults 65+ with a Self-Care Difficulty
16.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
TX Value
(8.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
US Value
(7.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Region: Rio Grande Valley Adults 65+ with a Vision Difficulty
Region: Rio Grande Valley Adults 65+ with a Vision Difficulty
11.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
TX Value
(7.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
US Value
(6.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Region: Rio Grande Valley Adults 65+ with an Independent Living Difficulty
Region: Rio Grande Valley Adults 65+ with an Independent Living Difficulty
20.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
TX Value
(14.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
US Value
(13.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Region: Rio Grande Valley Adults without Health Insurance (CCHC)
Region: Rio Grande Valley Adults without Health Insurance (CCHC)
61.0%
(2016-2018)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(63.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Region: Rio Grande Valley Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Alzheimer's Disease
Region: Rio Grande Valley Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Alzheimer's Disease
38.1
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
TX Counties
The distribution is based on data from 160 Texas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,140 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
TX Value
(40.6)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
US Value
(31.0)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(33.2)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Region: Rio Grande Valley Alzheimer's Disease or Dementia: Medicare Population
Region: Rio Grande Valley Alzheimer's Disease or Dementia: Medicare Population
18.7%
(2018)
Compared to:
TX Counties
The distribution is based on data from 252 Texas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,124 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
TX Value
(12.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
US Value
(10.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(18.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Region: Rio Grande Valley
Health / Oral Health
Value
Compared to:
Region: Rio Grande Valley Adults 65+ with Total Tooth Loss
Region: Rio Grande Valley Adults 65+ with Total Tooth Loss
13.8%
(2020)
Compared to:
TX Counties
The distribution is based on data from 254 Texas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
US Value
(13.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Region: Rio Grande Valley Adults who Visited a Dentist
Region: Rio Grande Valley Adults who Visited a Dentist
48.3%
(2020)
Compared to:
TX Counties
The distribution is based on data from 254 Texas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
US Value
(64.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Region: Rio Grande Valley Dentist Rate
Region: Rio Grande Valley Dentist Rate
30
Dentists per 100,000 population
(2022)
Compared to:
TX Counties
The distribution is based on data from 242 Texas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,054 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
TX Value
(63)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
Prior Value
(30)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Region: Rio Grande Valley
Health / Other Conditions
Value
Compared to:
Region: Rio Grande Valley Adults with Arthritis
Region: Rio Grande Valley Adults with Arthritis
19.9%
(2020)
Compared to:
TX Counties
The distribution is based on data from 254 Texas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
US Value
(24.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Region: Rio Grande Valley Adults with Kidney Disease
Region: Rio Grande Valley Adults with Kidney Disease
3.9%
(2020)
Compared to:
TX Counties
The distribution is based on data from 254 Texas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
US Value
(3.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Region: Rio Grande Valley Chronic Kidney Disease: Medicare Population
Region: Rio Grande Valley Chronic Kidney Disease: Medicare Population
40.5%
(2018)
Compared to:
TX Counties
The distribution is based on data from 252 Texas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,143 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
TX Value
(26.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
US Value
(24.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(39.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Region: Rio Grande Valley Osteoporosis: Medicare Population
Region: Rio Grande Valley Osteoporosis: Medicare Population
11.0%
(2018)
Compared to:
TX Counties
The distribution is based on data from 243 Texas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,086 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
TX Value
(6.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
US Value
(6.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(11.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Region: Rio Grande Valley Rheumatoid Arthritis or Osteoarthritis: Medicare Population
Region: Rio Grande Valley Rheumatoid Arthritis or Osteoarthritis: Medicare Population
39.8%
(2018)
Compared to:
TX Counties
The distribution is based on data from 252 Texas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,143 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
TX Value
(34.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
US Value
(33.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(39.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Region: Rio Grande Valley
Health / Physical Activity
Value
Compared to:
Region: Rio Grande Valley Adults who are Obese (CCHC)
Region: Rio Grande Valley Adults who are Obese (CCHC)
48.3%
(2016-2018)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(51.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Region: Rio Grande Valley Adults who are Obese (Clinic A)
Region: Rio Grande Valley Adults who are Obese (Clinic A)
53.1%
(2017-2019)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(52.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Region: Rio Grande Valley Adults who are Obese (Clinic B)
Region: Rio Grande Valley Adults who are Obese (Clinic B)
51.5%
(2017-2019)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(51.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Region: Rio Grande Valley Adults who are Obese (Clinic C)
Region: Rio Grande Valley Adults who are Obese (Clinic C)
49.2%
(2019)
Compared to:
Community Target
(36.91%)
Region: Rio Grande Valley Adults who are Obese (Clinic D)
Region: Rio Grande Valley Adults who are Obese (Clinic D)
17.4%
(2019)
Compared to:
Community Target
(13.02%)
Region: Rio Grande Valley Adults who are Overweight (CCHC)
Region: Rio Grande Valley Adults who are Overweight (CCHC)
35.9%
(2016-2018)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(30.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Region: Rio Grande Valley Adults who are Overweight (Clinic A)
Region: Rio Grande Valley Adults who are Overweight (Clinic A)
29.9%
(2017-2019)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(30.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Region: Rio Grande Valley Adults who are Overweight (Clinic B)
Region: Rio Grande Valley Adults who are Overweight (Clinic B)
32.5%
(2017-2019)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(31.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Region: Rio Grande Valley Adults who are Overweight (Clinic C)
Region: Rio Grande Valley Adults who are Overweight (Clinic C)
28.0%
(2019)
Compared to:
Community Target
(21.02%)
Region: Rio Grande Valley Adults who are Overweight (Clinic D)
Region: Rio Grande Valley Adults who are Overweight (Clinic D)
11.5%
(2019)
Compared to:
Community Target
(8.60%)
Region: Rio Grande Valley Adults who are Sedentary
Region: Rio Grande Valley Adults who are Sedentary
33.5%
(2020)
Compared to:
US Value
(23.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
HP 2030 Target
(21.8%)
Region: Rio Grande Valley
Health / Prevention & Safety
Value
Compared to:
Region: Rio Grande Valley Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Falls
Region: Rio Grande Valley Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Falls
2.8
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 988 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
TX Value
(8.2)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
US Value
(9.8)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(2.3)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Region: Rio Grande Valley Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Unintentional Injuries
Region: Rio Grande Valley Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Unintentional Injuries
24.0
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
TX Counties
The distribution is based on data from 164 Texas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,454 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
TX Value
(40.6)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
US Value
(51.6)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(23.2)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(43.2)
Region: Rio Grande Valley
Health / Respiratory Diseases
Value
Compared to:
Region: Rio Grande Valley Adults with COPD
Region: Rio Grande Valley Adults with COPD
6.4%
Percent of adults
(2020)
Compared to:
TX Counties
The distribution is based on data from 254 Texas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
US Value
(6.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Region: Rio Grande Valley Adults with Current Asthma
Region: Rio Grande Valley Adults with Current Asthma
8.8%
(2020)
Compared to:
TX Counties
The distribution is based on data from 254 Texas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
US Value
(9.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Region: Rio Grande Valley Asthma: Medicare Population
Region: Rio Grande Valley Asthma: Medicare Population
4.6%
(2018)
Compared to:
TX Counties
The distribution is based on data from 237 Texas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,045 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
TX Value
(4.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
US Value
(5.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(4.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Region: Rio Grande Valley COPD: Medicare Population
Region: Rio Grande Valley COPD: Medicare Population
13.1%
(2018)
Compared to:
TX Counties
The distribution is based on data from 252 Texas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,132 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
TX Value
(11.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
US Value
(11.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(12.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Region: Rio Grande Valley
Health / Sexually Transmitted Infections
Value
Compared to:
Region: Rio Grande Valley Chlamydia Incidence Rate
Region: Rio Grande Valley Chlamydia Incidence Rate
453.4
Cases per 100,000 population
(2017)
Compared to:
TX Counties
The distribution is based on data from 254 Texas counties.
TX Value
(511.6)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
US Value
(524.6)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is National Center for HIV/AIDS, Viral Hepatitis, STD, and TB Prevention
Region: Rio Grande Valley Gonorrhea Incidence Rate
Region: Rio Grande Valley Gonorrhea Incidence Rate
61.6
Cases per 100,000 population
(2017)
Compared to:
TX Counties
The distribution is based on data from 254 Texas counties.
TX Value
(160.2)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
US Value
(170.6)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is National Center for HIV/AIDS, Viral Hepatitis, STD, and TB Prevention
Region: Rio Grande Valley HIV Diagnosis Rate
Region: Rio Grande Valley HIV Diagnosis Rate
10.8
Cases per 100,000 population
(2017)
Compared to:
TX Counties
(2019)
The distribution is based on data from 254 Texas counties.
TX Value
(15.5)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
Region: Rio Grande Valley Syphilis Incidence Rate
Region: Rio Grande Valley Syphilis Incidence Rate
37.2
Cases per 100,000 population
(2017)
Compared to:
TX Value
(7.6)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
US Value
(11.9 in 2019)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is National Center for HIV/AIDS, Viral Hepatitis, STD, and TB Prevention
Region: Rio Grande Valley
Health / Tobacco Use
Value
Compared to:
Region: Rio Grande Valley Cigarette Spending-to-Income Ratio
Region: Rio Grande Valley Cigarette Spending-to-Income Ratio
2.6%
(2023)
Compared to:
TX Counties
The distribution is based on data from 254 Texas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
TX Value
(2.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
Prior Value
(2.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Region: Rio Grande Valley
Health / Wellness & Lifestyle
Value
Compared to:
Region: Rio Grande Valley Poor Physical Health: 14+ Days
Region: Rio Grande Valley Poor Physical Health: 14+ Days
15.0%
(2020)
Compared to:
TX Counties
The distribution is based on data from 254 Texas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
US Value
(10.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Region: Rio Grande Valley Self-Reported General Health Assessment: Poor or Fair
Region: Rio Grande Valley Self-Reported General Health Assessment: Poor or Fair
28.3%
(2020)
Compared to:
TX Counties
The distribution is based on data from 254 Texas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
US Value
(14.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Region: Rio Grande Valley
Community / Crime & Crime Prevention
Value
Compared to:
Region: Rio Grande Valley Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Homicide
Region: Rio Grande Valley Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Homicide
3.3
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 495 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
TX Value
(6.3)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
US Value
(6.6)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(3.0)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
HP 2030 Target
(5.5)
<div>IVP-09: Reduce homicides <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong></div>
Region: Rio Grande Valley Violent Crime Rate
Region: Rio Grande Valley Violent Crime Rate
2,994.5
Crimes per 100,000 population
(2018)
Compared to:
TX Counties
(2014-2016)
The distribution is based on data from 253 Texas counties.
TX Value
(420.4 in 2014-2016)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
US Value
(386.5 in 2014-2016)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(299.4)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Region: Rio Grande Valley
Community / Demographics
Value
Compared to:
Region: Rio Grande Valley Female Population
Region: Rio Grande Valley Female Population
51.0%
(2017)
Compared to:
TX Value
(50.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
US Value
(50.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(51.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Region: Rio Grande Valley Male Population
Region: Rio Grande Valley Male Population
49.0%
(2017)
Compared to:
TX Value
(49.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
US Value
(49.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(48.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Region: Rio Grande Valley Population American Indian and Alaska Native
Region: Rio Grande Valley Population American Indian and Alaska Native
0.6%
(2017)
Compared to:
TX Value
(1.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
US Value
(1.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(0.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Region: Rio Grande Valley Population Asian
Region: Rio Grande Valley Population Asian
1.0%
(2017)
Compared to:
TX Value
(5.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
US Value
(5.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(0.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Region: Rio Grande Valley Population Black or African American
Region: Rio Grande Valley Population Black or African American
0.8%
(2017)
Compared to:
TX Value
(12.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
US Value
(13.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(0.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Region: Rio Grande Valley Population Hispanic or Latino
Region: Rio Grande Valley Population Hispanic or Latino
91.6%
(2017)
Compared to:
TX Value
(39.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
US Value
(18.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(91.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Region: Rio Grande Valley Population Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander
Region: Rio Grande Valley Population Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander
0.0%
(2017)
Compared to:
TX Value
(0.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
US Value
(0.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(0.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Region: Rio Grande Valley Population Over Age 65
Region: Rio Grande Valley Population Over Age 65
11.6%
(2017)
Compared to:
TX Value
(12.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
US Value
(15.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(11.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Region: Rio Grande Valley Population Two or More Races
Region: Rio Grande Valley Population Two or More Races
0.5%
(2017)
Compared to:
TX Value
(2.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
US Value
(2.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(0.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Region: Rio Grande Valley Population Under Age 18
Region: Rio Grande Valley Population Under Age 18
32.2%
(2017)
Compared to:
TX Value
(26.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
US Value
(22.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(32.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Region: Rio Grande Valley Population Under Age 5
Region: Rio Grande Valley Population Under Age 5
9.0%
(2017)
Compared to:
TX Value
(7.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
US Value
(6.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(9.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Region: Rio Grande Valley Population White
Region: Rio Grande Valley Population White
97.1%
(2017)
Compared to:
TX Value
(79.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
US Value
(76.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(97.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Region: Rio Grande Valley Population White (Not Hispanic or Latino)
Region: Rio Grande Valley Population White (Not Hispanic or Latino)
6.9%
(2017)
Compared to:
TX Value
(42.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
US Value
(60.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(7.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Region: Rio Grande Valley Total Population
Region: Rio Grande Valley Total Population
1,370,424
People
(2017)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(1,357,644)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Region: Rio Grande Valley
Community / Public Safety
Value
Compared to:
Region: Rio Grande Valley Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Motor Vehicle Traffic Collisions
Region: Rio Grande Valley Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Motor Vehicle Traffic Collisions
9.4
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
TX Counties
(2014-2018)
The distribution is based on data from 136 Texas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 1,266 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
TX Value
(12.9)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
US Value
(11.4)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(10.2)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
HP 2030 Target
(10.1)
Region: Rio Grande Valley Alcohol-Impaired Driving Deaths
Region: Rio Grande Valley Alcohol-Impaired Driving Deaths
28.2%
Percent of driving deaths with alcohol involvement
(2018)
Compared to:
TX Counties
(2017-2021)
The distribution is based on data from 254 Texas counties.
U.S. Counties
(2017-2021)
The distribution is based on data from 3,116 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
TX Value
(25.2% in 2017-2021)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
US Value
(26.3% in 2017-2021)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(30.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Region: Rio Grande Valley
Community / Social Environment
Value
Compared to:
Region: Rio Grande Valley Children in Single-Parent Households
Region: Rio Grande Valley Children in Single-Parent Households
32.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
TX Counties
The distribution is based on data from 254 Texas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,132 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
TX Value
(25.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
US Value
(24.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Region: Rio Grande Valley People 65+ Living Alone
Region: Rio Grande Valley People 65+ Living Alone
21.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
TX Counties
The distribution is based on data from 254 Texas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
TX Value
(23.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
US Value
(26.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Region: Rio Grande Valley
Community / Transportation
Value
Compared to:
Region: Rio Grande Valley Community Spending on Transportation
Region: Rio Grande Valley Community Spending on Transportation
21.9%
(2023)
Compared to:
TX Value
(18.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
US Value
(17.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(21.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Region: Rio Grande Valley Gasoline and Other Fuels Spending-to-Income Ratio
Region: Rio Grande Valley Gasoline and Other Fuels Spending-to-Income Ratio
5.8%
(2023)
Compared to:
TX Counties
The distribution is based on data from 254 Texas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
TX Value
(3.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
Prior Value
(6.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Region: Rio Grande Valley Households without a Vehicle
Region: Rio Grande Valley Households without a Vehicle
6.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
TX Counties
The distribution is based on data from 254 Texas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
TX Value
(5.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
US Value
(8.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Region: Rio Grande Valley Mean Travel Time to Work
Region: Rio Grande Valley Mean Travel Time to Work
22.1
Minutes
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
TX Counties
The distribution is based on data from 252 Texas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,131 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
TX Value
(26.6)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
US Value
(26.7)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Region: Rio Grande Valley Solo Drivers with a Long Commute
Region: Rio Grande Valley Solo Drivers with a Long Commute
22.0%
(2018)
Compared to:
TX Counties
(2018-2022)
The distribution is based on data from 254 Texas counties.
U.S. Counties
(2018-2022)
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
TX Value
(38.9% in 2018-2022)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
US Value
(36.4% in 2018-2022)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(24.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Region: Rio Grande Valley Workers Commuting by Public Transportation
Region: Rio Grande Valley Workers Commuting by Public Transportation
0.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
U.S. Counties
(2015-2019)
The distribution is based on data from 3,142 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
TX Value
(1.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
US Value
(3.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(5.3%)
Region: Rio Grande Valley Workers who Drive Alone to Work
Region: Rio Grande Valley Workers who Drive Alone to Work
77.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
TX Counties
The distribution is based on data from 254 Texas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
TX Value
(75.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
US Value
(71.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Region: Rio Grande Valley
Economy / Employment
Value
Compared to:
Region: Rio Grande Valley Size of Labor Force
Region: Rio Grande Valley Size of Labor Force
594,905
Persons
(January 2024)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(592,066)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Region: Rio Grande Valley Unemployed Workers in Civilian Labor Force
Region: Rio Grande Valley Unemployed Workers in Civilian Labor Force
6.3%
(January 2024)
Compared to:
TX Counties
The distribution is based on data from 254 Texas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on non-seasonally-adjusted data from 3,140 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
TX Value
(4.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
US Value
(4.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(5.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
